I'VE OFTEN WONDERED why is it so hard to find any mainstream information regarding this long running, potentially multimillion dollar, copyright battle between Ms Sophia Stewart, and Hollywood regarding the rights to the movies; Matrix and Terminator.

The lack of publicity lends itself to the belief that maybe it is just one of those internet hoax stories that suddenly appear, do the rounds on the net, and then just as suddenly disappear. Well today (25th Nov 09) it has surfaced again. Once again we are being led to believe, that Ms Stewart has finally triumphed over Hollywood, and that she has allegedly won her case in some unnamed court.

After trawling all the news sites, (again) all I can find is copies of the same carefully prepared press release, with the same old poor quality black-and-white picture of Ms Stewart that has been circling the net for years. Surely, if there is any truth to this story someone can upload an up-to-date picture of the sister? You know, the one where she's coming out of court jubilant because she has just won a massive life-changing whack of wonga!... Apparently not.

Now, I'm not saying that this story is a hoax, but now I'm even more confused over this story than ever before. As a news editor of a website, do you just perpetuate the same old press release in full knowledge of the fact that you do not have an original source for it? (print and be damed stylee) In doing so, don't you risk becoming a part of the whisper conspiracy? Surely Hollywood can't gag everyone! So where are the blow-by-blow urban street reports?

The Holy Qur'an (49.6) says that: "When an unrighteous person bring you news, look carefully into it less you hurt a people in ignorance and be sorry for what you have done". In that light, I'm going to give the press release a miss. I'll wait until we get something more concrete.

Below is the response to the continuing saga by someone called: counter-racism. I discovered it on a website while trying to get more info.

SOPHIA STEWART’S FORMER LAWYERS — “HAD THE EVIDENCE, HID IT AND DID NOT SUBMIT IT IN THE CALIFORNIA COURTS”

What evidence?

• The “Terminator” & “Matrix” movies already in the attorney’s possession
• 600 Pages of probative evidence
• Constructive Trust Pacific Western Productions
• The shell company that produced the 1:45sec [verbatim] out of Stewart’s 81 Third Eye Movie Treatment
• The articles of Incorporation with the Secretary State of California
• The names of Attorneys who constructed the Trust
• Lubell’s Confession, Forged Admissions and other documents
• Perjury Affidavits of all the Defendants, Bruce Isaacs & John Shulaman
• Stewart’s copywritten Movie Treatment and manuscript (81, 83, & 84)
• The Third Eye” book itself

What Pedigree lawyer on case worth BILLIONS of dollars is going to fumble routine legal tasks; such as submitting crucial evidence to win a case? Since when did lawyers cease the desire to make money? When did news become so one sided? Why is Sophia’s Story being “blacked-out” of the mainstream media? Why hasn’t Main Stream media Contacted Sophia Stewart to hear her side of the story? Madoff’s story did not get back yard coverage. Sophia Stewart’s story is the Bernie Madoff of Hollywood worth BILLIONS! Is the media paid off?

A band of corrupt Attorneys charged Sophia Stewart, Legal Owner of The Matrix & Terminator, $50,000.00 (U.S. dollars) only to sabotage her entire California civil case by withholding the submission of the most critical evidence. We know now why Sophia Stewart did not appear in California court: She was bared and gagged from doing depositions and appearances.

According to New York District Attorney Thomas Warnom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau, Stewart’s former attorney Jonathan Lubell received “a sentence of One to Three Years in August of 2005”. Jonathan Lubell confessed to have forgered Stewart’s Admissions (among other documents), all by himself without anyone else’s help. Not one of Sophia Stewart’s former lawyers had the integrity to inform Stewart of the fact that Jonathan Lubell was convicted and serving time, due to forgery and grand larceny, while working Stewart’s Billion dollar case.

Jonathan Lubell’s confession and conviction is an Automatic Default judgment. Sophia Stewart has won both cases! Therefore, a convicted attorney Jonathan Lubell along with, Michael Stoller (indicted for fraud), Dean Webb (cited for rambling) and Gary Brown (indicted for fraud) represented a “cavalry of corruption” that rode in to sabotage Stewarts multi-Billion dollar Civil Case in California Courts. Again, since when did lawyers cease the desire to make money?

Sophia paid her former lawyers $50,000.00 (U.S. dollars) to do their jobs as attorney’s and officers of the court, not “saboteurs” working as “the loyal opposition” behind their clients back. If Sophia Stewart wasn’t telling the truth, there would be no reason for a “cavalry of corruption” to perpetrate over 30 counts of fraud & perjury. Judge Brooke C. Wells ruled that the 30 counts of Fraud and Perjury stand as of August 11th 2009. And as you know two sentences of fraud over turns and wins a case because a Judge can not aid & abet in a criminal scheme.

If you own something, you don’t need a “fake deed” because you have the real one. Sophia Stewart has the real copyrights to the Matrix and the Terminator; therefore she is the legal owner. Fraud is used to hide the truth, never to compliment it.

Help Sophia with her legal case by purchasing a CD-Interview @ The counter-racism mall click here Office Tel: 530.923.2043 (10am – 2pm pst) Email: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

Media Assassin Extraordinaire

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Neo-Tech
written by Mark, November 25, 2009

Ms Stewart, has not and can not win her copyright case for the movie Matrix, because the Wachowski Brothers based the movie on a book called The Neo-Tech Discovery. Hence why Keanu Reeves called "Neo"

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Sophia Stewart
written by Randal, December 30, 2009

From what I know of she did win her case. I did have the the info, but don't think I do anymoor will take a look and see what I have got.

• 
• +0
• 
•